|
The Standard English Template and Essay
Evaluation Database:
A Writing Teacher's Comment Palette |
|
|
An excellent evaluation of a student
composition speaks directly to the individual writer, validates effort, and inspires the student to explore his thoughts in an
even more engaging manner, with clearer language, and more effective
argumentation. Even so, there are a number of aspects of a
teacher’s typical response to a student composition which can be
expressed using objective standards. Time and again we all make
similar comments about a student’s punctuation, grammar, language
usage, diction, organization, and documentation.
If we ask the computer to search for particular objects or
word strings, these standard comments can be quickly read,
tabulated, and evaluated by a computer.
|
|
This objective report can quickly assess
the student’s progress towards a designated level of achievement
appropriate to his age and educational development. We can quickly
assess the student’s mastery of English punctuation and usage, his
understanding of essay form, the quality of his organization and
argumentation, even his use of the various rhetorical forms
essential to effective sentence variety.
|
|
No computer in the near future will
possess the versatility to assess the English language with the same
skill as a good teacher. Assessment of student writing requires the
experience and subjective intuition of a teacher. However, the
computer can still serve the teacher in ways hitherto impossible.
|
|
In a series of meetings
during the winter of 2000-01 members of Gilman’s English
department devised a toolbar to assist them in the marking of
student compositions on line. Recognizing the way that word
processors can facilitate student revision, a group of English
teachers resolved to mark papers electronically and return papers
online. Our initial motivation for moving towards computerized
grading was our recognition that this type of document exchange
makes it easier for students to revise and improve their writing.
However, we quickly realized that the computer could serve writing
teachers in new and interesting ways.
|
|
We
devised a tool bar that could be used by teachers to insert the
standard comments both positive and negative that typically appear
in any composition. As a basis for our toolbar standards, we
referred to the punctuation rules and composition handbook that have
been in use at Gilman for over sixty years. Next, we devised a
search program that could quickly tabulate the number of times a
particular comment appeared in a given document or series of
documents. The program creates a report that suggests the particular
aspects of the student’s writing that need attention.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return Home |
|
|