Urban Injustice: How Ghettos Happen 
			By David Hilfiger, MD 
			 
			Introduction 
			 
			When we Americans want to do something about poverty, we usually set 
			about "improving" poor people. We may offer education or job 
			training, establish programs to develop the parenting skills of 
			young mothers, require addiction treatment as a condition for 
			receiving housing, put time limits on welfare benefits in order to 
			motivate poor people to work, or refuse additional welfare payments 
			to discourage further childbearing. 
			 
			This practice of improving poor people has a long history. Early 
			American reformers traced extreme poverty to intoxication, laziness, 
			and other kinds of unacceptable behavior. They tried to use public 
			policy and philanthropy to elevate poor people's characters and 
			change their behavior. As the years passed, different sets of 
			behaviors were blamed for poverty and successive methods suggested 
			to improve the poor. Later reformers looked to evangelical religion, 
			temperance legislation, punitive poor houses, the forced breakup of 
			families, and threats of institutionalization- all to improve poor 
			people. 
			 
			This approach has rested on the persistent belief that the 
			individual faults of the poor are the primary causes of poverty. 
			Ignorance, lack of training, addiction, laziness, defective 
			character, sexual promiscuity, too many children: the list goes on 
			and on. It is not surprising, of course, that a nation so strongly 
			committed to individualism should so often search for the roots of 
			poverty within the poor persons themselves. 
			 
			In this short book, I want to consider poverty from a different 
			vantage point. I want to suggest that the primary causes of poverty 
			lie not in individual behavior at all, but in specific social and 
			historical structures, in forces outside any single person's 
			control. This is not to deny that most poor people's character could 
			use some improving (as could most of the rest of ours), but it is to 
			suggest that the essential causes of American poverty lie elsewhere: 
			in the paucity of jobs on which someone might support a family, in 
			inadequate access to health care and child care, in meager 
			educational resources, in specific government policies, in 
			nonexistent vocational training, in the workings of the criminal 
			justice system, and, for African Americans, in a painful history of 
			slavery, segregation, and discrimination. 
			 
			The American stereotype of poverty has become the single-parent, 
			black, inner-city family. And, indeed, African Americans are three 
			times more likely to be poor than whites. In the 2000 Census, 
			however, almost half (46.8 percent) of America's poor were white, 
			close to another quarter (23.0 percent) were Hispanic, and 6.2 
			percent were Native American, Asian, and Pacific Islander. Only just 
			over one-quarter (26.2 percent) were African Americans. Of those 
			poor Americans, almost a quarter (22.0 percent) lived in rural areas 
			and more than a third (36.4 percent) in suburbs. Of African 
			Americans in poverty, less than half live in the urban ghettos that 
			have come to be the almost exclusive definition of poverty in the 
			American mind. 
			2. 
			This book is largely about those black Americans, only about 12 
			percent of all our poor people, who do live in the inner-city 
			ghettos. Many other books could be (and have been) written about 
			white poverty, about Hispanic poverty, about Native American 
			poverty, about poverty in general. Why, then, is this white, 
			middle-class physician writing about black, urban poverty? 
			 
			The simplest answer is that it's what I know about. 
			 
			In 1983, after seven years as a rural physician in northeastern 
			Minnesota, I moved to Washington, D.C., to practice medicine in two 
			small inner-city clinics. African Americans are Washington's 
			predominant population and—aside from immigrant groups that have 
			recently been expanding—the poor here are overwhelmingly black. For 
			five years, my family and I lived in Christ House, a medical 
			recovery shelter for homeless men. In 1990, we started Joseph's 
			House, a community and hospice for formerly homeless men dying with 
			AIDS, where we lived for three years. For almost two decades, then, 
			I have lived and worked among the black, urban poor. Their plight 
			has been my primary professional concern. 
			 
			More important, what I know about and what concerns me the most 
			unfortunately fits all too well with both public and media 
			stereotypes of poverty. When most Americans think about poverty, or 
			see the poor on television, or read about them in the newspapers, 
			the images are of poor black men hanging around the street corner, 
			poor black teenagers selling drugs, poor black single mothers living 
			on welfare, poor black inner-city schools failing their children. In 
			spite of the statistics, in our country poverty has become 
			synonymous with black, urban poverty. Since the late 1960s, when 
			President Lyndon B. Johnson's War on Poverty ended in "failure," 
			poverty has been almost a code word for the inner-city black ghetto, 
			its drugs and its crime. If, then, we are going to face the larger 
			questions of what to do about poverty in America, there's really no 
			way to go but through the ghetto—both as it really exists and as 
			most Americans imagine it. 
			 
			Finally, I'm writing about poverty and the ghetto because the 
			reasons for their existence and the links between them are not at 
			all mysterious but lie clearly in history. It's nowhere near as hard 
			as most of us imagine to grasp the causes of black, urban poverty 
			(or, for that matter, white, rural poverty), and it's important not 
			to attribute those causes simply to slavery. If we were to decide to 
			put our minds, our energy, and some of our nation's resources to 
			work, there are solutions we could choose. Right now. 
			 
			Yes, most of us tend to ascribe poverty to the behavior of the poor 
			themselves, and yet, if we were honest, we would admit to at least 
			some puzzlement over, say, why young black children are four times 
			more likely to be poor than their white counterparts, or even why 
			the black ghetto exists in the first place. 
			 
			I am no stranger to the individual weaknesses of the poor and black 
			in America. It’s the nature of a doctor’s work to see people who 
			are in trouble one at a time, and it has often seemed to me that the 
			immediate causes of my patients’ poverty did lie in their own 
			behavior. For some, addictions consume their time and energy. Others 
			would not (or could not) cooperate with my medical treatment plans. 
			Still others lacked parenting skills or discernible job skills. And 
			some just didn’t seem to want to work. 
			 
			3.  
			But the more time I spent with even the most troubled of my 
			patients, the more obvious it became that virtually all of them were 
			doing close enough to the best they could in the overwhelmingly 
			difficult environment they inhabited. The odds against which they 
			struggled, however, are massive. If you haven’t lived it or even 
			seen it firsthand, there’s almost no way to imagine it. Living in 
			the ghetto, one faces problems with public housing, family 
			violence, drug and alcohol abuse, the drug trade, negligent 
			landlords, criminals, illness, guns, isolation, hunger, ethnic 
			antagonisms, racism, and other obviously negative forces. Even 
			forces that might seem positive in other circumstances—the law, the 
			media, government, neighbors, police—can, in the ghetto context, 
			make life miserable for the poor. And one has to contend with all of 
			these forces—any one of which might be overwhelming—all at once, 
			without a break. Turn to deal with one problem, and three attack you 
			from behind. Experience a little unexpected bad luck, and you find 
			yourself instantly drowning. The cumulative effect of the "surround" 
			is more than the sum of any of these individual forces. There is 
			simply no space to breathe. 
			 
			When I first arrived in Washington, I was already familiar with many 
			of the structural causes of poverty. But like so many of us, I was 
			convinced that if the individual could be strengthened enough, he or 
			she could make it out of the ghetto, and if enough people could be 
			strengthened, the ghetto itself would collapse. I have spent the 
			better part of a professional career trying to strengthen individual 
			poor people. While that may have been a positive endeavor, I no 
			longer believe that individual efforts to improve individual poor 
			people will substantially reduce poverty. 
			 
			The argument that inner-city poverty comes primarily from the 
			personal weaknesses of poor people simply cannot be sustained. Among 
			African-American children under the age of six, half live in 
			poverty. Among African-American males between the ages of eighteen 
			and thirty-four in the city of Washington, half are in the criminal 
			justice system. There are only two possible explanations for these 
			and many similar statistics. Either African Americans are 
			genetically predisposed to poverty, or specific forces in their 
			environment have kept large numbers poor! 
			 
			For centuries, whites have consciously or unconsciously found the 
			explanation in theories of racial inferiority. 
			 
			In this book, I will argue what has long been evident to African 
			Americans and should long since have been obvious to everyone else: 
			something awful has been done to the black poor in this country. 
			Allowing for that monumental injustice, however, how does one 
			explain the individual behavioral deficiencies that seem so 
			prevalent among poor African Americans (and other groups of 
			Americans in poverty)? How can one account for the extraordinarily 
			high rates of single parenthood, widespread substance abuse, 
			problematic parenting, and criminal behavior within the black 
			ghettos? If the reason is not some genetic inferiority, what does 
			cause these problems in the first place? And why do they persist? 
			 
			4.  
			Even after a decade of practicing medicine in the inner city, I 
			found I couldn't answer those questions in ways that satisfied me. 
			This proved so frustrating that, in a foolhardy moment, I 
			volunteered to teach a course on the causes of urban poverty. It was 
			undoubtedly my way of putting myself on a collision course with what 
			I felt I still needed to learn. In search of answers, I plunged into 
			an extensive, often impressive, and remarkably consistent library of 
			books and articles of all sorts on the nature, causes, and 
			consequences of urban poverty. I was often shocked at how little I 
			had known. 
			 
			The result is this book, for which I make no claim to originality. 
			Quite the opposite. What I've tried to do is take the work of many 
			scholars and journalists—often long, sometimes inspiring, but also 
			sometimes dry or written for academic peers—and condense the essence 
			into a single, short work that might explain urban poverty to 
			anyone: exactly the book that in all those rushed years of doctoring 
			I might have longed for and used. 
			 
			Complex as urban poverty and the behaviors that surround it might 
			seem, there is, in fact, a certain basic simplicity to the problem 
			and to the sorts of solutions that are (this perhaps surprised me 
			more than anything) not hopelessly utopian and suitable only for an 
			unimaginable, distant future. These solutions are, instead, 
			remarkably close at hand, practical, and capable of being instituted 
			were we only of a political mind to do so. 
			 
			After a decade of unprecedented economic prosperity in the richest 
			country the world has ever known, the poverty rate at the time of 
			the 2000 Census was at its lowest in a generation. Nevertheless, 
			11.3 percent of all Americans, more than one out of every nine 
			people, lived below an official poverty level that severely 
			underestimates what most of us would consider poverty. Even more 
			distressing, almost one out of six American children under eighteen 
			(16.2 percent) and almost one out of three of African-American 
			children under eighteen (30.9 percent) lived in poverty. Why?  |