|
A Challenge to the Existence
of Evil |
|
From Spinoza, Benedict de. Spinoza's
Short Treatise on God, Man and Human Welfare. trans.
Lydia Gillingham Robinson (Chicago: Open Court Publishing,
Co., 1909), 145-146.
In the middle
of the seventeenth century, a Dutch Jew expelled
from his synagogue, Benedict de Spinoza (1632-1677),
began to formulate and publicize his own conception
of the Divine. He imagined a Perfect and Infinite
Being who existed in all things and from which all
things emanated. In his view, God and Nature were
one, uniting the spirit and matter. Consequently,
Spinoza soon insisted, there was no room for evil
and no logical place for the Devil. Natural law,
which for Spinoza was divine, could not be
overturned, and therefore witchcraft could not
possibly occur. Spinoza challenged all men to
clarify their theological beliefs and definitions
and to realize that evil had to be contradictory to
the nature of the Divine. |
|
|
“Devils”
We shall now treat briefly as to whether devils exist or
not, in this wise: If a devil is a thing that is opposed to
God and has nothing of God, it corresponds exactly with the
'nothing' of which we have previously spoken.
If, as some do, we assume him to be a thinking being,
that neither wills or nor accomplishes good, but puts
himself in opposition to God, he is surely very wretched,
and if prayers can avail they should be offered for his
conversion.
But let us see whether such a miserable being could exist
for a moment, and we will find out at once that it could
not; for from the perfection of the thing arises all its
endurance, and the more existence and divinity it has in
itself the more permanent it is. Since a devil has not the
slightest perfection, how should he be able to exist? To
which we add that constancy or duration in the mode of the
thinking thing arises only through the union that such a
mode has with God which springs from love. Since exactly the
opposite of this union has been stated of devils they cannot
exist.
Since there is no necessity to assume the existence of
devils why assume it? For it is not necessary for us (as for
some others) to assume devils in order to find the cause of
hate, envy, anger and similar passions, because we have
found them satisfactorily without such fancies.
|
|