Poverty and poor crops
to Amiens; women are now ploughing with a pair of horses to sow
barley. The difference of the customs of the two nations is in
nothing more striking than in the labours of the sex; in England,
it is very little that they will do in the fields except to glean
and make hay; the first is a party of pilfering, and the second of
pleasure: in France, they plough and fill the dung cart. ...
...
To La Ferté Lowendahl, a dead flat of hungry sandy gravel,
with much heath. The poor people, who cultivate the soil here, are
métayers, that is, men who hire the land without ability
to stock it; the proprietor is forced to provide cattle and seed,
and he and his tenant divide the produce; a miserable system, that
perpetuates poverty and excludes instruction. ...
...
The same wretched country continues to La Loge; the fields are
scenes of pitiable management, as the houses are of misery. Yet
all this country is highly improveable, if they knew what to do
with it: the property, perhaps, of some of those glittering
beings, who figured in the procession the other day at Versailles.
Heaven grant me patience while I see a country thus neglected--and
forgive me the oaths I swear at the absence and ignorance of the
possessors. ...
Pass Payrac, and meet many beggars, which we had not done
before. All the country, girls and women, are without shoes or
stockings; and the ploughmen at their work have neither sabots nor
feet to their stockings. This is a poverty, that strikes at the
root of national prosperity; a large consumption among the poor
being of more consequence than among the rich; the wealth of a
nation lies in its circulation and consumption; and the case of
poor people abstaining from the use of manufacturers of leather
and wool ought to be considered as an evil of the first magnitude.
It reminded me of the misery of Ireland.
...
Take the road to Moneng, and come presently to a scene which
was so new to me in France that I could hardly believe my own
eyes, A succession of many well built, tight, and COMFORTABLE
farming cottages, built of stone, and covered with tiles; each
having its little garden, inclosed by clipt thorn hedges, with
plenty of peach and other fruit-trees, some fine oaks scattered in
the hedges, and young trees nursed up with so much care, that
nothing but the fostering attention of the owner could effect any
thing like it. To every house belongs a farm, perfectly well
inclosed, with grass borders mown and neatly kept around the corn
fields, with gates to pass from one inclosure to another. The men
are all dressed with red caps, like the highlanders of Scotland.
There are some parts of England (where small yeomen still remain)
that resemble this country of Bearne; but we have very little that
is equal to what I have seen in this ride of twelve miles from Pau
to Moneng. It is all in the hands of little proprietors, without
the farms being so small as to occasion a vicious and miserable
population. An air of neatness, warmth, and comfort breathes over
the whole. It is visible in their new built houses and stables; in
their little gardens; in their hedges; in the courts before their
doors, even in the coops for their poultry, and the sties for
their hogs. A peasant does not think of rendering his pig
comfortable, if his own happiness hangs by the thread of a nine
years lease. We are now in Bearne, within a few miles of the
cradle of Henry IV. Do they inherit these blessings from that good
prince? The benignant genius of that good monarch, seems to reign
still over the country; each peasant has the fowl in the pot.
...
September 1st. To Combourg, the country has a savage
aspect; husbandry not much further advanced, at least in skill,
than among the Hurons, which appears incredible amidst inclosures;
the people almost as wild as their country, and their town of
Combourg one of the most brutal filthy places that can be seen;
mud houses, no windows, and a pavement so broken, as to impede all
passengers, but ease none--yet here is a château, and inhabited;
who is this Mons. de Chateaubriant, the owner that has nerves
strung for a residence amidst such filth and poverty? Below this
hideous heap of wretchedness is a fine lake, surrounded by well
wooded inclosures. ...
...
1788
To Montauban. The poor people seem poor indeed; the children
terribly ragged, if possible worse clad than if with no clothes at
all; as to shoes and stockings they are luxuries. A beautiful girl
of six or seven years playing with a stick, and smiling under such
a bundle of rags as made my heart ache to see her: they did not
beg and when I gave them any thing seemed more surprized than
obliged. One third of what I have seen of this province seems
uncultivated, and nearly all of it in misery. What have kings, and
ministers, and parliaments, and states, to answer for their
prejudices, seeing millions of hands that would be industrious,
idle and starving, through the execrable maxims of despotism, or
the equally detestable prejudices of a feudal nobility. ...
...
1789
The 12th. Walking up a long hill, to ease my mare, I
was joined by a poor woman, who complained of the times, and that
it was a sad country; demanding her reasons, she said her husband
had but a morsel of land, one cow, and a poor little horse, yet
they had a franchar [42 lb.] of wheat, and three chickens,
to pay as a quit-rent to one Seigneur; and four franchar of
oats, one chicken and 1 £ to pay to another, besides very heavy
tailles and other taxes. She had seven children, and the cow’s
milk helped to make the soup. But why, instead of a horse, do not
you keep another cow? Oh, her husband could not carry his produce
so well without a horse; and asses are little used in the country.
It was said, at present, that something was to be done by some
great folks for such poor ones, but she did not know who nor how,
but God sends us better, car les tailles & les droits nous
écrasent.1 This woman, at no
great distance, might have been taken for sixty or seventy, her
figure was so bent, and her face so furrowed and hardened by
labour,--but she said she was only twenty-eight. An Englishman who
has not travelled cannot imagine the figure made by infinitely the
greater part of the country women in France; it speaks at the
first sight, hard and severe labour: I am inclined to think, that
they work harder than the men, and this, united with the more
miserable labour of bringing a new race of slaves into the world,
destroys absolutely all symmetry of person and every feminine
appearance. To what are we to attribute this difference in the
manners of the lower people in the two kingdoms? To GOVERNMENT.
...
...
Nangis is near enough to Paris for the people to be
politicians, the perruquier that dressed me this morning tells me,
that every body is determined to pay no taxes, should the National
Assembly so ordain. But the soldiers will have something to say.
No, Sir, never: be assured as we are, that the French soldiers
will never fire on the people: but, if they should, it is better
to be shot than starved. He gave me a frightful account of the
misery of the people; whole families in the utmost distress; those
that work have a pay insufficient to feed them--and many that find
it difficult to get work at all. I enquired of Mons. de Guerchy
concerning this, and found it true. By order of the magistrates no
person is allowed to buy more than two bushels of wheat at a
market, to prevent monopolizing. It is clear to common sense, that
all such regulations have a direct tendency to increase the evil,
but it is in vain to reason with people whose ideas are immovably
fixed. Being here on a market-day, I attended, and saw the wheat
sold out under their regulation, with a party of dragoons drawn up
before the market-cross to prevent violence. The people quarrel
with the bakers, asserting the prices they demand for bread are
beyond the proportion of wheat, and proceeding from words to
scuffling, raise a riot, and then run away with bread and wheat
for nothing: this has happened at Nangis, and many other markets;
the consequence was, that neither farmers nor bakers would supply
them till they were in danger of starving, and, when they did
come, prices under such circumstances must necessarily rise
enormously, which aggravated the mischief, till troops became
really necessary to give security to those who supplied the
markets. ...
...
Letters form Paris! all confusion! the ministry removed: Mons.
Necker ordered to quit the kingdom without noise. The effect on
the people of Nancy was considerable. I was with Mons. Willemet
when his letters arrived, and for some time his house was full of
enquires; all agreed, that it was fatal news, and that it would
occasion great commotions. What will be the result of Nancy?
The answer was in effect the same from all I put this question to:
We are a provincial town, we must wait to see what is done at
Paris; but every thing is to be feared from the people, because
bread is so dear, they are half starved, and are consequently
ready for commotion. This is the general feeling; they are as
nearly concerned as Paris; but they dare not stir; they dare not
even have an opinion of their own till they know what Paris
thinks; so that if a starving populace were not in question, no
one would dream of moving. This confirms what I have often heard
remarked, that the deficit would not have produced the
revolution but in concurrence with the price of bread. Does not
this shew the infinite consequence of great cities to the liberty
of mankind? Without Paris, I question whether the present
revolution, which is fast working in France, could possibly have
had an origin.