The New York Review of Books Issue The Other Franklin Book of Ages: The Life and
Opinions of Jane Franklin by Jill Lepore Knopf, 442 pp., $27.95 A scene from Samuel
Richardson’s novel Pamela, in which Mr. B. comes upon Pamela writing;
painting by Joseph Highmore, 1744. Benjamin Franklin printed an edition of
Pamela in 1742, and Jill Lepore writes that it is
likely he gave a copy to his sister Jane. “I blame myself for not sooner desiring you to
lay in your Winter’s Wood,” Benjamin Franklin
apologized to his seventy-five-year-old sister Jane in the fall of 1787. He
was concerned that she might not have enough firewood to get through the
rough New England winter. “But I have been so busy,” he explained. It was the
first letter he had time to write after the Constitutional Convention in
Philadelphia. In her eloquent Book of Ages: The Life
and Opinions of Jane Franklin, Jill Lepore, a
professor of history at Harvard and a staff writer for The New
Yorker, imaginatively weaves together the lives of Benjamin Franklin and
his favorite sister Jane, the youngest of the family’s ten children—though Lepore keeps a far closer focus on Jane. Benjamin, she
tells us, always worried about his sister. “I sometimes suspect that you may
be too unwilling to acquaint me with any of your Difficulties,” he wrote to
her in December 1787. She quickly reassured him. “I do indeed Live
comfortable,” she replied: I have a good clean
house to Live in my Grandaughter constantly to atend me to do whatever I desier
in my own way & in my own time…we live frugaly
Bake all our own Bread…& if a Friend sitts and
chats a litle in the Evening we Eate
our Hasty Puding (our comon
super) after they are gone. And she shared with her brother her
satisfaction at decorating the new house he had given her in the North End of
Boston. “I am now Pritily settled have had two
Rooms New Papered an Painted.” Brother and sister met infrequently over the
years. Benjamin ran away from home in 1723 when he was seventeen; he became a
printer, philosopher, scientist, and diplomat in London and Paris and a
Founding Father of the United States. He signed the Declaration of
Independence, the Treaty of Paris that ended the American Revolution, and the
Constitution. Jane Franklin married Edward Mecom, a
poor saddler, in 1727 when she was fifteen years old. He was “either a bad
man or a mad man,” Lepore judges, noting that none
of their children ever named a child for him. He fell into debt, and Jane
grew accustomed to sheriffs turning up at their door, demanding payment of
bills. Did he wind up in debtors’ prison? “Very likely,” Lepore
surmises. Jane gave birth to twelve children—two of whom
went mad—and buried eleven of them. As if writing a poem in prose, Lepore evokes the recurrent pattern of twenty years of
childbearing: Her nights were
unquiet. Her husband reached for her. Her belly swelled, and emptied, and
swelled again. Her breasts filled, and emptied, and filled again. Her
children waked, first one, and then another, tumbling together, like a
litter. She must have had very little sleep. It is a discouraging picture of days cluttered
with “rags for washing, rags for diapering, rags for catching blood.” At
fifty-three, Jane became a widow, and the years after her husband’s death
were scarcely less dark and troubled. She kept a boardinghouse and toiled as
a seamstress. Throughout her life, she worked, overworked, and struggled. From 1776 until 1785, Benjamin Franklin was
the American minister in France, successfully securing crucial French
economic and military assistance for the Revolutionary army. Plainly dressed,
bespectacled, and unpowdered, he brought the spirit
of the new nation to France and became the toast of Paris. “My Face is now
almost as well known as that of the Moon,” he
bragged to his sister. But those turbulent times brought her no such
gratification. “The Ravages of war are Horrible,” she wrote.
Jane spent the war years wandering, seeking safe shelter with family and
friends in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Philadelphia. “I am Grown such a
Vagrant,” she sighed. After the war, always in need of money, she labored to
survive—and relied on her brother’s assistance to stay afloat. In 1783 he
arranged an annuity for her. “How am I by my Dear Brother Enabled to live at
Ease in my old Age,” she wrote. The following year, she forlornly referred to
herself as “a Poor Useles, and wrothless
worm.” Toward the end of her sad days, she did her best to make her peace
with life. “It is trew I have some Trobles,” she admitted, but “when I Look Round me on all
my Acquaintance I do not see won I have Reason to think Happier than I am.” Though Lepore finds
Jane on occasion “miffy” and “saucy,” Jane’s story
is painfully claustrophobic; her confined life was one of frustration,
intellectual deprivation, work, boredom, and loss. “Sorrows roll upon me like
the waves of the sea,” Jane wrote to her brother in October 1767. “I am
hardly allowed time to fetch my breath. I am broken with breach upon breach.” Do insignificant lives on the margins of great
events merit their own memorials? “Is not anyone who has lived a life, and
left a record of that life,” asked Virginia Woolf, “worthy of biography—the
failures as well as the successes, the humble as well as the illustrious?”
For her part, Jill Lepore agrees with Woolf,
believing that she will find value and meaning in the sad life of Jane
Franklin. “I began to think that Benjamin Franklin’s sister had something to
say after all, something true, something new.” She
has in mind “a quiet story of a quiet life of quiet sorrow and quieter
beauty.” But is the periphery really as important as
the center? Are the inarticulate people who were barely awake to the
momentous times they were living in as worthy of our attention as those who
shaped the institutions and landscape in which we continue to live? The
answer is yes—and no. Or perhaps we can say that the recovery of a woman like
Jane Franklin pertains not to the larger arc of American history, but instead
to what we might call the importance of the ordinary. Rather than focusing on
the astounding achievements of the “dead white males” of the Revolutionary
generation and rather than aiming for the penetrating, complex portraits of
its key figures drawn by Joseph Ellis or the sweeping, seminal
interpretations of the founding period conceived by Gordon Wood, Lepore and many other young historians today prefer to
search out those plain people who they feel have been ignored and neglected
by past historians. They regard their mission as historians not to explain
how and why the American Revolution happened, but rather to give voice to the
voiceless. These historians often face the challenge of a
paucity of solid historical evidence. Jane Franklin’s slim “Book of
Age’s”—the chronicle she kept of births and deaths in her family—has
survived, but most of the letters she wrote to her brother Benjamin Franklin
have not. Though they corresponded with each other their entire lives—from
1727 when Benjamin was twenty-one and Jane fourteen until he died in 1790—all
of Jane’s letters from the 1720s, 1730s, and 1740s are lost. The first letter
of hers to survive is from 1758, when she was forty-six years old. “The facts
of Jane Franklin’s life are hard to come by,” Lepore
acknowledges. And so, she tells us that she decided to make Jane’s silence
the object of her investigation, rather than an obstacle to it. Lepore compensates for the absence of historical
evidence with interesting excursions into eighteenth-century commerce,
publishing, literature, and law, and also with her own diverse ruminations,
associations, speculations—and inventions. She confesses that, faced with the
hurdle of a “miserably scant” paper trail, she “thought about writing a novel
instead.” Jane Austen did. “Men have had every advantage to us in telling
their own story,” commented Anne Elliot, the heroine of her novel Persuasion. Austen’s
novels, Lepore suggests, with their female
heroines, were her answer to the conventional biographies of great men. And
so, following Austen’s lead, she describes her own book as “a history, a
biography, but, in the spirit of the age in which Jane [Franklin] lived, it
borrows from the conventions of fiction.” Infusing her study with some of the intimacy
and domesticity of fiction, she tells a melancholy tale, simply, artlessly—in
brief chapters and short sentences, in simple language, as if she were
adopting, along with Jane’s unschooled spelling, her unsophisticated,
uncomplicated, unworldly perspective. She searches for the rhythms of Jane’s
speech, the sadness in her voice, the thwarted aspirations, the feelings of disappointment
and disillusionment. And thus we enter a realm in which fiction and
nonfiction blend together. “I rendered some epistolary exchanges in the form
of dialogue,” Lepore notes. The fusion of her voice
and Jane Franklin’s along with her own reflections and associations leave us
with an intellectual self-portrait of Jill Lepore
along with her warm and engaging biography of Jane Franklin. Deeply sensitive to language, Lepore rightly suggests that history can be revealed not
only by analyzing events but also by creatively analyzing words themselves.
Etymologies are particularly helpful. The first periodical to be called a
“magazine,” she informs us, wasThe
Gentleman’s Magazine in London in 1731. Etymologically, a magazine
is an arsenal, “an arsenal of knowledge…. A magazine is a
library—knowledge—cut into bits, so that more people can use it. Magazines,
then, contained the great and soaring promise of the age: knowledge for all.” Knowledge for all—but what about knowledge for
Jane Franklin? At the root of Jane’s sunless life Lepore discerns an act of seduction. Ben Franklin had
admonished his sister when she was only fourteen to “remember that modesty,
as it makes the most homely virgin amiable and charming, so the want of it
infallibly renders the most perfect beauty disagreeable and odious.” Had he
been worried that she might lose her virtue, her reputation, and thus her
future? Would she listen? The following year, Jane found herself married to
Edward Mecom. Lepore conjectures that, the day Jane wed, she might
have been pregnant, “which would explain why her father gave her permission
to marry so unpromising a man at so unwise an age.” Many eighteenth-century
brides were pregnant, Lepore notes. Still, the
parish register of the Mecoms’ Brattle Street Church
in Cambridge recorded no child born to Jane until nearly two years after her
marriage. And so Lepore hypothesizes that “if she
was pregnant when she married, she either miscarried or gave birth to a baby
born dead. And then she might have stared out across the water in the harbor
and known that she had married a wastrel for naught.” Mixing genres of
biography and fiction as she told us she would, Lepore
creates a novelistic tableau of a heartsick young woman, pitifully
recognizing that her future has evaporated. Had Jane seen glimpses of an alternative life?
In 1742, Benjamin Franklin printed an edition of Samuel Richardson’s Pamela:
Or, Virtue Rewarded. That famous novel recounts the story of a girl
working as a servant for a wealthy family, who finds herself in dire peril of
being seduced by the gentleman of the house after his mother dies. But when
Mr. B. comes across the girl’s letters—“Why,Pamela,”
he cries, “you write a very pretty Hand, and spell tolerably, too”—he is so
impressed by her innocence and native intelligence that he marries her. Might
Jane Franklin Mecom, by now many years into an
unhappy marriage that had crushed any dream of higher aspirations, have read
Richardson’s novel? Lepore can only guess, finding
it “likely” that Franklin gave a copy to his sister. “What must she have made
of it?” Lepore wonders. “She was Pamela,
unimproved. She was Pamela, undone.” Another novel, published in 1787, Charlotte:
A Tale of Truth, became a best seller. This time seduction takes a mortal
course: a fifteen-year-old girl is seduced by an older man, gives birth, and
dies. The author, Susanna Rowson, who would go on
to found the Young Ladies’ Academy of Boston, apparently knew that the
antidote to seduction was education. The words “seduction” and “education” in fact
share the same Latin root: ducere, to
lead. Seduction leads astray (“se-”), while education leads out (“e”)—out of
our unformed, primitive selves. Education civilizes us, prepares us for
participation in society, in culture, in public service. Education opens the
gates of the world. It provides the exit, the one way out. But few men of the founding generation
believed that women were capable of intellectual equality with men. Thomas
Jefferson proposed universal education for girls—but only to an elementary
level. It was boys—white boys, actually—who might aspire to the “natural
aristocracy” of the learned and wise who would govern the new republic. In
the many letters of advice and encouragement that Franklin, Washington,
Hamilton, Adams, Jefferson, and other eminent members of the Revolutionary
generation wrote to their sons, grandsons, and other young male relatives,
they always emphasized the paramount importance of serious study. But when writing to daughters and young female
relatives, they encouraged other talents—good letter-writing, drawing, music,
and especially virtue. They were more worried about the vulnerability of
girls to seduction than they were interested in further ing
their education. “The passions of your sex are easier raised than allayed,”
George Washington cautioned his step-granddaughter, Nellie Custis. “In the composition of the human frame there is a
good deal of inflammable matter…[and] when the torch
is put to it, that which is within you may
burst into a blaze.” An exception to this line of thought was
Jefferson’s vice-president, the remarkable and turbulent Aaron Burr, who took
a radically different tack with his daughter Theodosia. An enthusiastic
member of the feminist avant-garde, Burr read Mary Wollstonecraft’sVindication
of the Rights of Woman with “avidity,” he told his wife. “Be assured
that your sex has in her an able advocate.” “I have a thousand questions to ask, my dear
Theo,” Burr affectionately wrote in 1793, when Theodosia was ten. “Every hour
of your day is interesting to me.” He oversaw
Theo’s education in mathematics, the classical languages, as well as English
composition. He taught her how to make elegant and effective use of language.
“Never use a word which does not fully express your thoughts,” he instructed.
“Arrange a whole sentence in your mind before you write a word of it.” When
she was eighteen, he insisted that she read newspapers every day, “not to
become a partisan in politics, God forbid”; but to master the “standing
topics of conversation.” It was an unusual education for a young woman
of her place and time; but even more unusual were the intimacy and candor
that colored the correspondence between father and daughter. Not only did he
share with Theo the details of his life—his drinking habits and his fondness
for dining out in New York—but after his wife died in 1795, he also shared
with her the details of his sexual liaisons and strategies for seducing young
women, often with running accounts of the successes and setbacks of his
campaigns. “On Friday I saw the inamorata,” he wrote to Theo in 1803. “My
attentions were pointed, and met a cheerful return…. I am now meditating
whether to take the fatal step to-morrow. I falter and hesitate, which you
know is not the way. I tremble at the success I desire.” A month after Vice President Burr killed
former Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton in their famous duel in New
Jersey in 1804, Burr suggested to his daughter, with disturbing aplomb, that
“if any male friend of yours should be dying of ennui, recommend him to
engage in a duel and a courtship at the same time.” Burr performed the
unusual feat of combining a superior education in arts and letters for his
beloved daughter with an advanced-level course in cynicism and predatory
lessons in the art of seduction.* Theodosia would marry a wealthy South Carolina
planter and politician. In the winter of 1812, she sailed from South Carolina
to New York aboard the schooner Patriot to see her father,
but the schooner disappeared at sea, its wreckage never found. Legends surrounded
the death of a woman of such extraordinary promise. Who would have considered
Jane Franklin Mecom so? Not Jane herself, who
understood her intellectual limitations in the light of her brother’s genius. Benjamin Franklin’s own remarkable intellect
was formed by his impassioned self-education as a youth, and it blossomed in
his commitment to public education and to a lively intellectual and
scientific culture. In 1731 he founded the first lending library in America,
the Library Company of Philadelphia. Twelve years later, he proposed
establishing the American Philosophical Society, the first learned society in
the colonies that would offer men interested in science and philosophy the
opportunity to share their knowledge and discoveries. And in 1749, he
published a plan for public education in Pennsylvania, emphasizing that “the
good Education of Youth has been esteemed by wise Men in all Ages, as the
surest Foundation of the Happiness both of private Families and of Common-wealths.” Franklin’s Enlightenment was communicative; it
belonged not to an intellectual elite but thrived by
its dissemination to people of all classes. Still, it was a mostly male
exercise—and his sister Jane served as a model of its limitations. “I have
such a Poor Fackulty at making Leters,”
she lamented in 1786. She frequently apologized for her “Bad writing” and her
“Blundering way of Expresing my
self.” Her brother kindly teased her, suggesting that she was “rather
fishing for Commendation. You write better, in my Opinion, than most American
Women.” Miserably true, Lepore interjects. Yet in that radiant Enlightenment spirit,
voices were being raised against the oppressively inferior education that
women received. In 1790, the Massachusetts Magazine contained
an essay “On the Equality of the Sexes” by Judith Sargent Murray, which
traced women’s subordinate role to the difference in the education provided
to girls and boys. “What partiality!” Murray exclaimed. “The one is taught to
aspire, and the other is early confined and limitted.
As their years increase, the sister must be wholly domesticated, while the
brother is led by the hand through all the flowery paths of science.” The
uncultivated sister, Murray concluded, is forced to live out her life in a
“void.” Two years later, the Massachusetts
Magazine published excerpts from Wollstonecraft’s radical A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Deprived of a real education,
Wollstonecraft argued, women were restricted to private life, unable to
comprehend public affairs or have any interest in politics or history. A rudimentary education had indeed imprisoned
Jane Franklin in that domestic sphere. Her brother had taught her how to
write, but when he left home, those lessons ended. And although the times
Jane lived in were intellectually electrifying and politically
transformational, her scant education and the burden of her personal
hardships overwhelmed what most historians regard as the most consequential
landscape in American history. It is striking how little understanding she
showed of those revolutionary events and how poorly she grasped the
groundbreaking Enlightenment ideas that shaped them. The Stamp Act in 1765
was eclipsed by her husband’s death that year. Did she know about Thomas
Paine’s passionate call for independence ten years later? “She likely read Common
Sense,” Lepore surmises. “Everyone read it.”
Perhaps. But as late as 1781 Jane felt unqualified to pronounce an opinion
“about publick Affairs,” and she admitted knowing
“but litle how the world goes Except seeing a
Newspaper some times which contains Enough to give Pain but litle Satisfaction while we are in Armes
aganst Each other.” War and revolution drowned in
Jane’s sea of desolation. “Something constantly Passes that keeps alive my
sorrow,” she wrote in 1782. Still, she remained hungry for knowledge and
understanding all her life. In 1767, she asked Benjamin to send her “all the
Pamphlets &Papers that have been Printed of yr
writing…. Do Gratifie me.” His works opened a
window into the life of the mind that had been denied to her. “I keep your
books of Philosophy, and Politics,” she wrote to him in 1786, “and it seems
as tho I were conversing
with you.” A very sad touch,
since, despite their mutual efforts, Jane was so far from a real conversation
with her brilliant, famous brother. As for his books, the Yale University
Press edition of The Papers of Benjamin Franklin has now
reached the year 1783 in forty volumes, with an estimated seven more volumes
to come, bringing us to his end in 1790. How rich was his
mind, how fortunate he was, Jane Franklin Mecom
knew. She wrote him that she was happy that he had the pleasure of his own
mind and that his “Intellets…suply
you with a Source of Entertainment beyond what comon
mortals can Expearance.” Hers was a different fate. 1.
In 1929, Mark Van Doren edited The Correspondence of Aaron Burr and
His Daughter Theodosia. In 1938, his brother Carl Van Doren
published his Pulitzer Prize–winning biography of Benjamin Franklin. Twelve
years later, Carl Van Doren published Jane Mecom, The Favorite Sister of Benjamin Franklin: Her Life
here first fully narrated from their entire surviving Correspondence. ↩ © 1963-2013 NYREV, Inc. All rights reserved. |